Does your novel need help?
Visit the
Critiquinator for expert assistance.

Monday, August 06, 2007

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling


I have only one thing to add, really, to the enormous pile of both professional and amateur Potter-related commentary online. Plot summary at Wikipedia, many interviews where Rowling finally "tells all," and of course enduring speculation. What did the Hufflepuff common room look like? What kind of toothpaste must Snape have used in order to manage a purple Patronus? Etc.
I've read and loved all the Harry Potter books -- they are literary confection and I truly enjoyed this final episode, even if the book won't count for my home study doctorate. ;)

Here's my thought, and it doesn't even contain any spoilers. About halfway through the book, it occurred to me that Harry's mental anguish, his internal conflict, his disappointment with his past and his longing for family, will all be resolved and his life will be fixed when he becomes a father. Seeing him in this light was strange and unfamiliar, and the fact that I had this thought told me that Rowling had done something special in following this boy from childhood into what obviously had become adulthood. If I was brought to the point where I realized that redemption was possible through having kids, then I was seeing him in a much different light than I saw him in book one, and Rowling's project, showing this coming of age in multiple thousands of pages, was a success.

That impressed me -- to bring your reader to his/her own realization of the "proper" outcome, just by showing the plot happening, is the ultimate accomplishment, for a writer of any kind of fiction. I thought she did a magnificent job and I really respect her for that.

I also appreciate that she added the "years later" epilogue. I think a lot of writers would have stuck up their noses at that type of thing, and acted all mysterious and "you'll have to imagine" or "no one can say" but she went ahead and drew out the whole thing clearly for her readers, and I don't think anyone felt that such a neatly tied bow at the end of the series was anything less than appropriate and kind. Well done.


Labels: , , ,

4 Comments:

At 7:42 PM, lauren said...

I couldn't agree more. I got angry with some critics and friends that scoffed at the 19 yrs epilogue but I thought of it as a lovely gift that JK was giving the kids and other fans that have stuck with this story so loyally for 10 years. It was a present and a gracious and lovely one at that.

thanks for your post it was a great view of the story.

 
At 6:07 PM, david said...

On the epilogue, I thought it served only as a compelling argument for why so many other writer's feel the need to avoid them.

The problem isn't really how things are in the epilogue, but how much isn't there. Things are at best marginally explained and there's only one thing we really know about the intervening years: that they got married and had children. Do they quibble? Do they see each other often? Do they just spend all their days talking about the olden times? Do they have jobs? It's all just absent.

 
At 5:21 PM, Lostcheerio said...

David, I guess I felt like the important things were there... and it would have been too gigantic a project to add just everything. Sure, people want more. But did they *need* more? I think they got what they needed, seeing him happy, married, and a dad, having a normal family, a normal life. Like so many people born into dramatic circumstances, that's all he wanted.

 
At 9:48 AM, Joshilyn said...

You know, you should read the EW essay by Stephen King about the series --- he had a simalar feeling, that Rowling succeeds BECAUSE Harry actually grows up. URL below.

(I was pro-epilogue, especially because I NEEDED to know his
second son's middle name. I felt that was owed --- and paid nicely.)

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20044270_20044274_20050689,00.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home